Quantity of Life vs Quality of Life

In the capitalistic system we value the amount of money the we have in our bank accounts. We value how much we have, how much money, how much materials, how much resources, how much sex we have, how many friends we have, how much, how much, how much. All of this gathering of value within quantity is irrelevant to life, because when you die, how much do you in fact have? Only yourself.

What we have done within the capitalistic system in only value the quantity of things/money, placing value on having more than having what's best, forgetting and ignoring the quality of things/life living/existent on the planet with us. We are searching for the quantitative value assuming and believing that more is better = the more the merrier = the more the happier I become. In this search we are missing the quality of all life that is being lived by the majority of the inhabitants of this Earth, not just humans but insects, trees, animals, bacteria, marine life, etc. We are living a life that is based on the principle of the more of a material one has the more value one has…the more money I have the more valuable I am…"What is my net Worth?" It is showing us all over that we value the quantity rather than the quality and as long as we have quantified enough money for only ourselves we don't care about the quality of life that we lead because we can simply add more to the quantity of shit that we possess to keep us happy, to keep us blind to the quality of life that is being lived placing value/happiness in quantity instead of happiness/value in Quality!

Ask yourself the questions - Does quantity of money exist? - based on a capitalistic system where the game of the monetary system is more profit, then yes, we are able to get more and more money, we are able to have quantity of money. We search for more quantity, we save for more quantity, we want more instead of having the best.

Does quality of money exist? Quality based on the actual physical reality of money, well you can have a quality bill where it is hard to be destroyed, but in that quality does not in fact exist as the bill will be circulated, traded from one person to the next to near infinity, but money is still going to have to be produced. More money will have to be injected into the monetary system as it is now existing to keep it fueled, in that the quality of money is not existent because the quality of the bill is in fact worthless when the quantity is where value is placed within. There is no better or worse money based on designed structure of lastingness as it doesn't last as money is valued within/as quantity = more quantity less value/quality = it doesn't matter if you have 100 million dollars if that dollar is not worth anything due to the quantity of that dollar in circulation = quality money doesn't exist as it is affected by inflation rates.

 Does the quality of life exist in the current money system? - yes it does, but that quality of life has been ignored for a long damn time because of the false value placed within the quantity of money. Quality of life has been not considered as much as the quantity because as long as one has quantity of money one is able to produce the quality of life for self without regards to the quality of life for all, in this allowing the quantity to destroy the quality as more is better without consideration of how the `more` exists, in that disregarding the quality of how the more exists. Creating more as value within harvesting more and more of the resources so that one is able to get more quantity of money/materials, in this calling it value, not considering the quality of that which is being resourced/created only the quantity.

 Does quantity of life exist? - Yes quantity of life exists, but again in the perspective of the capitalistic system quantity is good in the aspect of we have more people to make money and inject into/as the capitalistic system, only valuing the quantity of life due to make more money. In this, quantity out weights the quality, through the perspective of having more people living on the planet the more money in circulation thus more quantity for everyone while disregarding the quality of life that it being lived. Only allowing a minority that have quantity of money to live in somewhat quality due to the quantity of humans. In this, the quality of life is accepted and not questioned by the minority that have the quantity, in this disregarding the quality of life equally throughout the planet because they have their comfort and happiness within the illusioned quantity of value.

Now within the Equal Money system that has no profit objective lets ask the same questions

 

Does quantity of money exist? - Quantity within the numbers yes, quantity within being able to have more or less, no because profit will not exist, one is not able to extract money from another to build up ones own bank account, meaning that when a `sale` is done the money does not continue into the seller's account, it disappears, so in this quantity does not exist in fact as it disappears from the equation once used. In the initial point of having digits in a bank account, sure that can be the `quantity` but that quantity is not able to be measured within more or less as money will not be `gained` through the sales of items. So within the accepted definition as it now stands as quantity being a more or less measured through comparison…no quantity will not exist within an Equal Money System.

Does Quality of money exist? - When money only exist as digits on a screen the quality of money will not exist, there will be no value in money, thus no form of use to make it qualitative. It will only be digits on a screen and used as a tool as it is used now as a means of transference of goods, but in that no profit will be allowed to exist, and understand that the goods are not going to be existent as they are today with massive companies doing the work and then transporting the goods across the globe for only a select few with the quantity of money to purchase. The goods will be based on person to person with/as that which would be given to all equally, in that which is in support of all life, as there is no profit so there is no point in creating a good solely based for profit and all that is left to consider is what will improve the quality of life equally for all.

Does Quantity of Life exist? Yes, there will be abundance of life, but the quantity will not be supported due to more influx of money into/as the system, quantity of life will be the prospering of life, allowing life to flourish, stopping the point of more life more money, but more life more life  to life with and as, in this allowing the ability of the quality of life to improve within the quantity of life until it has reached it's peak and plateau (the best)

Does Quality of Life exist? Most definitely. What is fascinating within this is that since there is no quantity of money existent, the only thing that is left of/as value is the quality of life that each individual lives within/as and since the quantity will not get quality = the more money the better life one has, as it exists now, the quality will be considered and given throughout in eQuality. Meaning that the goal will no longer be in the search for more and more and more money in order to maintain or improve upon a quality of living. The goal will be the quality of living throughout in Equality, where the quality of life will improve in each individuals life when all life is given quality of life equally simply through the global actions in improving the quality of life equally, not allowing the individual quality to be valued within the quantity of money. The quantity will not outweigh the quality, and in that the quality of life will be taken into consideration, as there will be no more search for more quantity to improve life, but how to improve the quality of life throughout the globe because of quality being the quality of life not based on quantity of life. The quality of life will finally be given value equally throughout the world, through the stopping of the search for quantity and to improve what we have here as the quality of life. It is to improve the life that is here, not to make more quantity in hopes of improvement through more quantity.

 

So what is fascinating in an Equal Money system is that to only thing that is left to consider value towards is the quality of life that each individual is living, and in equality we will be able to start to look at how each individual's quality of life is being lived, in this giving value to life itself. There will be no more search for more, only the quality of what is here will be improved as there will be no `more` as `more` has always been a lie, no more resources can exist than what is here, so in this the goal is to then improve the quality of that which we create out of the resources so that we no longer need to dig for MORE resources, improve the living conditions of EVERYTHING, laptops, televisions, trees, bugs, animals, cups, clothes - improve the quality of the life that is being lived within/as everything that is this Earth/universe.

So…visit http://equalmoney.org share your vote on each of the categories, share comments and start to support a life where the quality of life is valued, not the quantitative value of digits/monies.

2012 Becoming Consumers

I just finished watching the documentary "Consuming Kids: The commercialization of childhood" which outlays how companies are specifically targeting kids to become consumers of specific products when they become older. It shows how children television shows support certain products throughout the show in order to get the kid to symbolize happiness/success or some other positive emotion with the product compelling them to find ways to manipulate their parents into buying the product for them.

What I want to cover in this blog is this point without judgment or morality. Looking at this point without judgment of the companies or advertising agencies, they have done extremely well in using the accepted and allowed systematics in this system in order to maintain their survival. They have done extensive research on children and what they react to, as far as watching them take a bath to see how they use and manipulate the products they use whilst taking a bath, in order to find out everything that they can mentally and physically to sell their product to them effectively. What is unfortunate here is that this is what this system wants and supports = survival of the fittest. The companies have gone this far because they must compete with other companies so they must find out absolutely everything about their demographic in order to manipulate them into becoming a consumer of said product from cradle to grave. So the only thing here is that they have done very well at managing their survival within capitalism through manipulating and deceiving the masses, they are brilliant in this aspect.

We start off as children and become impulsed continuously, daily, with messages and symbols from media outlets that promote happiness, fun, enjoyment, success, or any other positively energized emotion in connect to that product. We then look for these products to fulfill our lives with and constantly search for in order to make ourselves feel happy, separating ourselves from ourselves as creators of ourselves. We then become emotionally possessed the majority of the time and we start to lose ourselves as who we are as life. This is what the system supports, this is what capitalism/consumerism supports. Is it the best interest of all life? Clearly no. We need a new system to live under, because unfortunately we as ourselves need to be guided at the moment, if we remove all systems at this point, life we become much more hectic, dangerous, `evil`, violent than ever. We need a system that supports all Life equally, one that gives all life on this planet an equal opportunity for life.

In an Equal Money System profit is removed, because CAPITAL is no longer the objective of the system. More money is irrelevant in an Equal Money System, so what we are left with is what can I/we produce that makes our lives easier and more effective. One can argue that contemplating a product that will make our lives easier is a symptom of capitalism, but what happens is that life is disregarded in this aspect, and only money is the focus point when considering a development. In an EMS what we will produce will be best for life because there will be no opportunity for deception or manipulation into getting the `upper hand` because all will be given to Equally. The necessities of life will be provided to everyone equally, and all will have the same opportunity as their neighbours. This is take a lot of work of course.
Companies won't have to fight for survival as well, they will not need to develop new ways of manipulating or deceiving the population into buying a specific product because the people that make up the company will be supported with or without said company, so they in turn are able to make the choice in which is best for life. The companies that have targeted kids to become consumers have only done so within the allowances of the accepted system. They have used the rules within the system to their advantage, so it is us who are equally responsible for allowing the system in place and it is us who must stop blaming and judging people who use the system because we use the same system, thus we must create a new system out of our own will, one that supports what is best for all life on this planet in every way. One that allows no opportunity or need to deceive, manipulate, and/or abuse. To find out how an Equal Money System will operate, and to find out how it will be implemented, visit http://equalmoney.org

Supressing Self

Through watching the documentary (the second part now) "The Century of Self" I have learnt that through suppressing our `natural` emotions, the emotions that are too outrageous for us to face, we become very confused beings, we become uncertain of who we are and of who we should become and what we should do with ourselves. This can lead to suicide, this can lead to hysteria, dementia, schizophrenia, and many other mental illnesses. The reason why these occur is because how we as humans have accepted and allowed society to develop, and how we have conditioned ourselves to conform to a certain accepted lifestyle. This conformity is the goal of society in order to keep society running/flowing in the way that it has been, and through conforming we become a guided programmed being with the goals and objectives in that which society has already `in store` for us. All of our life is directed once we conform to `how we should live`, and in that we become automated following the direction that which society would like for us, and in that not directing ourselves but having these desires and unconscious thoughts direct us.

Within conforming to society we are suppressing who we are as humans, through attempting to live like `civilized` beings, not taking a look at who we are as `nature` and deciding to change that as who we are as our nature. Our nature is disgusting = look at how we have been treating the Earth and ourselves, look at how we have in fact been existing. It is not special, we are not significant, we are actually quite fucking oblivious to how we are actually existing, we are not a benevolent creature, we are a destructive one. So what is interesting about the point of the ability to suppress ourselves is that if we are able to suppress ourselves we are able to change ourselves, we are able to stop living as our accepted nature, but in order to change ourselves we must face ourselves. We must face the ugliness as who we are and in that face who we are as thoughts, as that which we have become, forgive the acceptance of how we have lived, remove the symbols that which stimulate how we have been living and set a goal of equality in that we see eachother as equals, as another being walking this planet equal and one to me, as another source of substance equal and one to me as substance equally, and in that realize that what we do to another we in fact do to ourselves, and live a new self living in a way that is best for all and best for self.

Investigate Desteni and Investigate an Equal Money System, see how we must change in order to live as new beings, and to stop our destructive self.

2012 Habitat Displacement and Equal Money System

There has been a scare for pet owners in this city now due to coyotes running around the city looking for food. In the paper there is an Article about a woman who was walking her dog on a leash, when a coyote came up to her and her dog and snatched the dog away from her so that the coyote could eat and feed its family.

This is due to the displacement of the coyotes. The area that the coyotes are running around in is a fairly new built area, so the environment and habitats had to be disrupted in order to build the homes, causing the animals that were here before to develop new ways of surviving

How this boils down to money is that, in the capitalistic system in order to generate a continuous growth, we must continuously be generating more product and in the housing market we thus need more houses and more land to expand on. Thus in capitalism there must be a never ending supply of development land in order for the real estate market to continue/survive. So through the expansion of housing we must take away land from animals that are on this planet with us, displacing the, causing them to find new ways of surviving, which leads to examples like the coyotes attacking pets in order to feed themselves. So money in the housing market = a need for development land = displacement and disruption of the ecosystem.

In an Equal Money system, the point of continuing generating money does not exist, thus the relative `expansion` due to capitalism will not exist wither, because we will not need to generate endless profit for our survival. Without the need for continuous input/profit we will be able to find and develop new ways of housing ourselves that do not disrupt habitats or disrupt habitats the least possible way, because money will not be the predominant factor in our direction. If we do need to disrupt nature/habitats/environment we would be able to give ourselves the time to consider the best way to do so, meaning cause as little harm as possible from our integration into/as the area, whereas now, we attempt to develop land as quickly as possible so that we can make money as fast as possible to further generate more and more and more profit. This brings me to the point of housing structure as well. The way houses are built now are a `cookie cutter` process, where everything is planned to go up as quick as possible for as cheap as possible so that the maximum amount of profit is achieved in the shortest amount of time...ok back to the point

In an Equal Money System we will have the time and opportunity to consider the displacement of animals when it to building. We will have the ability to consider what we are in fact having influence and consequence on. We won't take on the position of this is our world and we can do what ever we please with it, ignoring all consequences along the way. We won't build endlessly causing a mass amount of destruction and harm to the environment for the game of profit. The end goal will not be more money, but the consequences of our actions, meaning that the object of our actions is the consequence of our actions being what is best for all.

                     This is why support of the Equal Money System is imperative to continue living on this planet, because if we continue the way we are we will only kill the life of this planet.

2012 Sweet Sweet Sugary Death.

While watching a speech given entitled “Sugar: The bitter Truth” it was fascinating to see how exactly the body breaks down our foods into chemicals that the cells take in to provide nutrients to itself, and how fructose is one of the worst things the chemically break down for our body. It is equal to consuming alcohol.  In the speech he says “you wouldn’t think twice about giving your child a Budweiser but we don’t even question given them a soda”.

It is astounding to hear how much sugar we ingest in a year and how much it has increased over the years since the end of world war 2. The reason why we have started to ingest so much sugar is because of the cheapness of that sugar and the ability to use sugar to make more money off of people. For example soft drink companies put caffeine and salt into their drinks which makes us dehydrated. The reason why the drinks do not taste bitter is because of sugar, thus the sugar coats our taste buds allowing us to only taste what is sweet while we are in fact dehydrating ourselves causing us to want to drink more which then leads us to drink more soft drinks if that is what we have become accustomed to drinking.  In this example the soft drink companies know what they are doing and because of the accepted capitalistic system this is not stopped even though it is a crime towards life because it leads to diabetes, mood swings, depression, addiction, heart attacks, strokes etc, when they can easily be prevented through not allowing an abundance of sugar to permeate through our food sources.

Why this is accepted and allowed the way it is is because of the capitalistic system, where in this system anything that is able to make money is allowed to be produced. Such as the `drug war` where governments are purposely allowing drugs to move through countries and be used in order to maintain a revenue for themselves and as well create the DEA so that they can control the flow of drugs and control the flow of money and have a agency that they can monitor easily so that they actually to do not solve the problem but allow it to continue all in order to make money. This goes the same for sugar and its effects on our bodies, where it is well known how much damage sugar does to our bodies but it is not regulated nor banned because companies make too much money off of it and they also have the FDA in their pocket to allow the abuse to continue unhindered all in order to generate capital.

The only time that this abuse of sugar will stop is when money is given equally so that all may have an equal say on what they want to eat. Because the families at the bottom of the pyramidic system do not have enough funds to support themselves eating healthy, they eat what they can get and what they can get is full of sugar which only causes more problems, so it is not a possibility for poor families to stop eating sugary products and eat healthy because the healthy food costs a fuck load more than the sugary foods. So as you can see, once money is distributed equally and we change the rules of the system in support of all life equally and in support of what is best for life only then will we see a change in the way we eat and a change in the products we consume. As for now I would suggest growing your own food…as much of it as you can so that we start creating distance from companies that infest their products with sugar and sugar related substances until we have an Equal Money system in place so that we can all have an equal say on what we want to eat, stopping the influence from a lack of money to dictate what and how we eat.

2012 Changing Human Nature

There is a measurement called the Power-Distance Index that measures how people see titles in this system and how they are within/as the definitions of the titles. For instance it measures how an employee will see their manager and how far they see the manager from themselves. A high power distance indexed country is Brazil, and a Low PDI country is New Zealand, so in Brazil a manager has a lot of power over an employee and that employee will be subservient to their manager to the fullest extent whereas in New Zealand an employee would take much less `shit` from their employer, and more so, see their employer as their equal.

In the book outliers `Outliers` by Malcolm Gladwell, the PDI is brought up in relation to investigating how flights crash and what events and significant roles are taking place in the case of crashes. The PDI consists of measuring a person’s view of a `superior` figure in their world to determine the PDI, but it is not only the `view` of a superior but the accepted and allowed `nature` of how the superior is able to be treated and is expected to be treated by a subordinate.  In the book an account of an auditor sitting in on a flight with Korean Air is given

In the Delta report on Korean Air that was posted anonymously on the Internet, one of the auditors tells a story of sitting in on a Korean Air flight where the first officer for confused while listening to the Air Traffic Control and mistakenly put the plane on a course intended for another plane…..and then comes the key sentence: “Captain hit First Officer with the back of his hand for making the error.””(Gladwell, 214)

In this example the power distance index is clearly shown where the captain is the superior and the first officer is the subordinate and the interactions between the two are severely one-sided. In the accepted and allowed nature of Koreans the superior is able to hit the subordinate for making a mistake and it is accepted as so, thus the nature of a subordinate that is programed into/as the culture of Koreans is to be submissive, passive, to take abuse, etc. Here is another example of how the accepted and allowed nature of a superior and a subordinate is Korean culture.

At a dinner table, a lower-ranking person must wait until a higher-ranking person sits down and starts eating, while the reverse does not hold true; one does not smoke in the presence of a social superior; when drinking with a social superior, the subordinate hides his glass and turns away from the superior;…in greeting a social superior a Korean must bow” (Ho-min Sohn)

Why this is important is because in the investigation of airline crashes the First officer whom was communicating with the Air Traffic control centre, or with the captain himself, who had witnessed a dire mistake with the route, plane, or operation of the plane was too timid and passive to speak up about the problem to his `superiors` which lead to quite a few crashes in Korean Airlines.

When all of this was going on (Korean Airlines is not a top ranking airline is flights to crash ratio) Korean Airlines called in an outside person to solve this problem which was inherent in the Korean’s nature. He had to re-train them to develop assertiveness and to take control over situations when it is needed from them to avoid a crash or a fatal failure in communication or operations. The Koreans who were employed by Korean Airlines had to make substantial changes to their nature of who they accepted and allowed themselves to be in order to function properly and safely while flying a plane.

After leaving Korean Air, Greenberg helped start up a freight airline called Cargo 360, and he took a number of Korean pilots with him. They were all flight engineers, who had been number three, after the captain and the first officer, in the strict hierarchy of the original Korean Air. “These were guys who had performed in the old environment at Korean Air for as much as fifteen to eighteen years,” he said. “They had accepted that subservient role. They had been at the bottom of the ladder. We retrained them and put them with Western crew. They’ve been a great success. They all changed their style. They take initiative. They pull their share of the load. They don’t wait for someone to direct them. These are senior people, in their fifties with a long history in one context, who have been retrained and are now successful doing their job in a Western cockpit (Gladwell, 220)

So for all you nay-sayers that human nature cannot and will not change in relation to an Equal Money system, here is proof that human nature can indeed change, it is all in the choices of who and what we accept and allow ourselves to be and become. You only are against an Equal Money system so that you can maintain your lifestyle and keep your abusive selves and the abusive system and world that we are currently living within/as. To state that human nature is unable to change is only stating that you are not willing to change as it is evident and clear that humans do in fact have the ability to change their nature. Stop fighting for your right to abuse, join desteni and change self into/as a better self that walks in support of what is best for all in every moment so that we may manifest what is best for all here on this Earth, and stop stating that human nature is unable to change as that is not fact.

Justice and Anger

A Man In Scarborough, Ontario has been accused of assaulting his family a number of times and of sexually assaulting one of his patients in his dental practice. He has been charged on three incidents of assaulting his family members. He got angry at his daughter for wanting to leave a family friend’s house and hit her ankle with a metal rod when they came home, ending her up in the hospital the day after. He became angry with his wife and threw a knife at her piercing her leg. He Threw a metal toy car at his son for telling his father to stop beating his wife. He has been charged six months in jail for his crimes and his dental license has been revoked.

2 things that can be discussed here are the point of justice and the point of the demon possession that is anger.

The fact that he has been sentenced to six months in jail is not going to solve his problems of lashing out on others because of his anger. The entire point of the justice system is not a correction it is a `quick fix` solution that does not actually fix the problem. Incarcerating this man is not going to give him the tools and understanding that he needs to deal with his anger. The only point that this may serve is installing fear in him so that he does not lash out again in this matter causing him to suppress the anger which causes a lot of health problems as well. In the justice system when people are jailed, it never ends up as a solution. It is a Temporary fix to the problem. It does not allow the person to investigate themselves in how they have made themselves angry, and why they choose to lash out on other in a way to deal with their anger. It does not provide tools to release the anger from within him, nor does it offer assistance to realize himself in his anger. Jailing a criminal does not solve the problem from happening again as it always deals with the problem after the fact, the real solution here would be stopping the issue from ever happening, thus the justice system is not a solution for this man’s anger, it is a punishment when anger should not be punished but understood.

The possession of anger is the accumulation of thoughts that manifest outbursts such as these that cause harm to others and self. This world does not support the self-understanding nor the ability to deal with through living a solution to anger. Thus events like these are able to happen. This world system does not stop events from happening prior we only deal with the consequences after which is not a solution to the events themselves, as a solution to the events would to be preventing them from happening in the first place. In the article it is never said or investigated as to why he got angry, or what was bothering him to the extent that he would lash out on his family members. He simply was sentenced to sit in jail = it is similar to being sent to sit in a corner when we were children = it didn’t solve our actions, only installed fear in us. This world is not set up in a way to give us the time to understand ourselves, thus we need a new way of living, and since our way of living is based on money we need a new way of dealing with money. Would this man beaten his family if he would have been given the funds to support his life? Would the family have stayed with this man if they were financially supported on their own? For the answers visit http://equalmoney.org and to start learning tools for self-investigation visit http://desteni.org

The hand that feeds us

I got told to stop skateboarding one day and was looking at the man’s words, and why he was basically telling me to stop enjoying myself and get out of the place that I was skateboarding in. I was skateboarding in an underground parking garage that is owned by the city. The city has to pay money for the structures that it builds and to maintain the structures. The cities life blood is money. Since skateboarding does mark up and `wreck` structures and objects, the city will have to pay for the repairs done to the structures/objects. The man that kicked me out was a worker for the city, the city pays him money so that he can live the life that he lives. I was questioning whether he really gave a fuck about me skateboarding in there or not because no one actually cares about another...since he was a worker for the city, the city gives him life = the city supports him, so in order for him to support his life the way it is he has to continue working for the city, and the cities interest is not having to pay money that it does not need to pay. So in this moment this man support the city because it supports his life and him telling me to get out of the parking garage was in support of the city’s interests and thus he was then supporting his job through supporting the city. We all fear losing our jobs because that means we have lost our accepted living conditions and standards, thus this man was speaking out of fear of losing his job, because if he were not to support the city’s interests the city would have a chance to remove his life blood through removing his income.

In this example this man was in support of a system that is absolutely abusive and extremely destructive of life because this man knew no better. Since the city was supporting his life and this man became comfortable with his life and knew no better life attainable than the one he current has, he fought for the system that is destructive, abusive, and harmful to life. He saw fear of his life being taken away from him by the city if he were to let me skateboard in that place and mark up the structure that the city has paid for causing the city to have to pay more money to keep it aesthetically pleasing. He was afraid of biting the hand that feeds him even though that hand smacks him as well. In this instance we all end up accepting the system once we accept our lives the way they are. We do not look for anything better nor can we think of anything better than what we have when we accept our lives the way that they are, we do not question whether or not life can be better for the ones who suffer, we do not think about a better existence that the one that we have because we are provided life by the one that we have, and all we are asking for is life. Life can be so much more than what it is, it can prosper, because the current system is destroying the conditions of life and since we have become comfortable with the destruction of our lives we do not question it nor do we realize that there can be a much better way of living. We become subservient to the hand that feeds us, and in that we accept the destruction, abuse, murder, rape of life that currently exists. There can be a much better life than the current system that we have now = all life can prosper, we only must stand as a group in support of a better life for all beings on this planet. Accepting our lives as comfortable is the acceptance of the abuse of the system. Thus we are directly abusing life through accepting and allowing this system to exist. And the reason we come to accept this system of abuse is because it provides life for us, thus it is the hand that feeds us and we fear not being fed by money because we fear dying.

Do we really get fed by money? Is income really the life blood of ourselves? Is this system then only but an illusion? Absolutely. This system is a lie and we are feeding the lie through accepting the medium that feeds us = money and the monetary system. The way we get fed is through the purchasing of goods with the tool of money within/as the accepted world system. But we as humans actually get fed through eating, through drinking, thus money is only but a false value and food source of life. Food is the source of life and money is the medium that allows us to purchase the food, and since money is limited and conditioned on supporting the system through working our ability to live is conditional and limited, but it doesn’t have to be.

In an equal money system we are given the funds so that we are able to provide life for ourselves. The medium of money is still a tool but the accepted rules, laws, and regulations of the system will be changed vastly. They will be in the principles of what is best for all and equality and oneness. When funds are provided to us unconditionally because we are life, life can prosper instead of being limited to having a job, and then we will have the time to change the way that we live, have time to create a new world and assist in supporting what we have destroyed. We will have the time to figure out this reality much more effectively, we won’t have to compromise our enjoyment to find money, we won’t have to search for ways to provide ourselves life here on Earth, it will be supported unconditionally simply through a change in the accepted system. We as humanity as life must stand together as life in support of a better life for life. We must fight the hand that feeds us and realize that we have been feeding ourselves the entire time, and change to a better method of feeding ourselves. For more information visit http://equalmoney.org and http://desteni.org

This system does not support Third World Nations becoming First World Nations

Living in a First world nation, I have heard many times that we need o support Third world nations into becoming first world nations..we must give the enough money, create enough funds, so that they too can have the infrastructure, the education, the luxury that exists in first world nations. Looking at that point ,it is absolutely impossible for third world nations to become first world nations in the current capitalistic, consumerist system that we live in because at the rate First world nations are using resources there won't be enough resources t share throughout the world for all nations on this Earth to become first world nations, thus for first world nations to have what we have, there must exist poverty to support us having what we have, there must be the opposite as it is clear that we are hording resources.

If we stopped the consumer culture that we live in, if we stopped wasting all of these items/products and started to, not conserve, but create and use things that are designed to last a life time we would be able to share the resources that we use, and allow third world nations to as well become `first world nations`

Obviously that would take a reworking of the current system we have, as the `growth` and stability of the system we have requires a constant transaction of money and having products/items that last a lifetime would be death for the current system = that is why things break down so easily and that is why planned obsolescence is considered beneficial to this system. So to have products that last a lifetime we must have a system that's life blood is not based on profit, we must have a self-sustaining system that is able to maintain itself without an influx of value, currency, worth, material etc. That is where the Equal Money system comes in. the life blood of the equal money system is not profit, it does not require a constant input of energy to support itself, all it requires to exist is the humans capacity to maintain its existence through accepting it as a way of living.

Thus in order for this world to live like a first world nation, we need products/items that last lifetimes, and in order to create items/products that last lifetimes we need a system that does not require a constant input of energy = we need a new system = we need an Equal Money System. If you do care about this world, the beings that live here, support and be an living example for the Equal money system. http://equalmoney.org

No More mountains of Food in an EMS

No More food mountains in an EMS.

Food mountains are literally mountains of food that we have decided are useless, when in fact they are only a few days old. The food have little imperfections, but none that make the food inedible. This is a point that is humiliating to humanity, as we throw out literally, mountains of food when there are 1 billion humans starving on this planet. In an EMS things will be produced for practicality, not profit as we have today, things will be made a supported from a point of practical usage, where in food will be produced because the need is there, not because one wants to make a profit off of the fact that we need to eat, thus production comes down to a point of making for the need, not making for the profit. In making for the need we only need to make as much as there is need, thus there is not going to be a place to store mountains of food, as that produced food will be based on practicality and the practicality is consumption of said food. In an EMS food will be produced for the necessity to eat, thus to waste food will be a crime against life. Thus no more mountains of thrown out food. For more information visit http://equalmoney.org

No More Bureaucracy in an EMS

No more bureaucracy in an EMS

Bureaucracies have become points in which a few implement laws and rules for the many. They are a select few people that are appointed with such power to implement and decide upon such rules, regulations, and laws. This is obviously the epitome of inequality. A few becoming the deciding factors for many, meaning that a few hold power over how many delegate their lives within/as rules, regulations, and laws. This will not exist in an Equal money system as the point within/as the equal money system is equality, thus there will be only one decision to be made and that is consistently and constantly what is best for all, thus creating in every moment what is best for all, and thus we live in a world that is best for all. Obviously as one is able to tell bureaucracies are only in the interests of a few, not in the interests of all as what is best for life to expand and flourish, thus bureaucracies will not longer exist in an Equal Money system due to the fact that it is not living equality.