Followers

Showing posts with label Living practicality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Living practicality. Show all posts

Sunday, December 11, 2011

No More mountains of Food in an EMS

No More food mountains in an EMS.

Food mountains are literally mountains of food that we have decided are useless, when in fact they are only a few days old. The food have little imperfections, but none that make the food inedible. This is a point that is humiliating to humanity, as we throw out literally, mountains of food when there are 1 billion humans starving on this planet. In an EMS things will be produced for practicality, not profit as we have today, things will be made a supported from a point of practical usage, where in food will be produced because the need is there, not because one wants to make a profit off of the fact that we need to eat, thus production comes down to a point of making for the need, not making for the profit. In making for the need we only need to make as much as there is need, thus there is not going to be a place to store mountains of food, as that produced food will be based on practicality and the practicality is consumption of said food. In an EMS food will be produced for the necessity to eat, thus to waste food will be a crime against life. Thus no more mountains of thrown out food. For more information visit http://equalmoney.org

Monday, October 24, 2011

Can We Move to Any City we Want in an EMS?


Can we move to any city we want in an EMS

The limiting factors within the current system and moving to another city or country are money and residence. If I want to move to another city right now, I first need to accumulate the funds to purchase the house, I must sell this house, and then attain transport to move `my` belongings to the other house – all of this costing money. This is the main point within the Equal Money System, that with the funds for life given to us the limitation of money is completely removed. So from a money point yes, we will be able to move to any city, or in that, country we would like.

However, it must be practical. If a building is going to go up just because there is a WANT to move there than that is impractical. If there is already a building there then move away. To use the resources this Earth provides for wants is currently what we have done and this is what it has gotten us (look at the state of the world), because who knows, ones wants could suddenly change immediately, and then there is another house on the land (possibly not being used), thus it becomes impractical. There is another point to consider which is quite cool and that is moving into a house that is already there that has a family living in it already. Look at that point, many reasons we don’t accept people into our houses is because of money, we do not want to feed them with our money, we do not want to heat them with our money, we do not want to clothe, bathe, or clean up after them with our money, thus we have become absolutely reluctant to letting a `stranger` into our homes without knowing that they are able to support themselves financially first. Within the EMS that is removed, as ones necessities are provided for them from birth to death, thus the reluctance to allowing a person into ones home due to finances becomes irrelevant. Taking that point into consideration it becomes absolutely possible to move anywhere you would like, moving is no longer a limitation, it becomes an adventure, and expansion, we no longer become a `resident` we no longer have to reside at one place, we are `free` to move where we would like, all based on practicality, and within an EMS there is nothing but practicality.

Thus we do become `free` to live or move in any city which we would like, as there is not a need to build a new home each time a person moves, we are able to share what we have because we will all be able to support ourselves financially, and thus we become independent or `free` if you will.

Another point to consider is our `belongings`. We will no longer own stuff but only use stuff = that is what we do now, just we attach this idea of owning something through the money that we pay for the item. So to take all of `our` stuff with us is not a necessity, we will be able to leave our stuff behind for another person to use it, as well we will be able to use the items that already exist in the place that we move to. No more ownership in an EMS, just usage of the items here, and thus no sentimental value to our belongings, thus no emotional attachment to couches, or chairs, or lamps etc, and within that we are able to `let our stuff go`.  

http://equalmoney.org

Tuesday, September 6, 2011

Money and Placing Value on Substance


Money and Placing Value on Substance

I, since being here have been pushing myself past limitations that I have held against myself from the perspective of ownership and money. When I got here – in the house that I live in now – I was limiting myself extensively from the basis of `this house is not mine` thus I have no ownership/right to it, thus I am a guest in this house which I held against myself and allowed myself to limit myself within. I limited myself at first in terms of food, and drink. I then thought about doing laundry less because I would use water and I am not paying for the water here and thus I have no right to it, thus I am a guest here using the facilities and I must `obey` by the unwritten rules of this household.

Showering was a main part that I was placing value upon = the monetary value of water = having to pay for the utilities that should be provided unconditionally, yet aren’t. So I was limiting myself on the usage of the shower or considering it because of the fact that it involved money and money wasn’t limitless thus I limited and considered limiting myself open showering.

This is something that I have adapted myself to become/do because of the fact that money is limited to ones income = it is not unconditionally given/received thus through me associating what is here with money I did not and still do not allow myself to unconditionally use what is here. I have limited myself extensively through/as the application of money, of how money is used in the current accepted reality.

The main point here is that I have not allowed myself to see substance as substance. I have continually associated a value to substance based on the usage/availability of money and thus have prioritized substance based on my/the limitation of money.

In reality substance is here unconditionally allowing me to use it as myself for whatever purpose/need/want I use it for. It does not judge, it does not limit itself, only I limit myself within the usage, only I judge myself within the usage. Substance allows itself here to be unconditionally supported/used for whatever need/want it is used for. It is us humans that actually have the choice unto what/how we use substance, which means we must investigate how we are using substance as substance and how we have limited ourselves within/as substance as my actions have shown me that I limit myself extensively though placing value onto/as substance through the application/necessity of money in this reality to survive, when really money is absolutely not needed in its current application for humans to survive. What takes for humans to survive is an unconditional support/usage/acceptance of substance here equal and one to us, meaning to realize that we as substance are substance and thus are not separate from substance meaning all that is here as substance. Even through the usage of the word substance implies no separation whatsoever.

Through attaching the value that I have associated with money and substance I have limited myself through placing priority on money itself when in fact substance needs to be priority in this reality as money is not substance in fact. We use substance to define money = money is thus not defining substance in which in the example of me limiting myself within showing I/we have done through defining the usage of water through/as the application/use of money = I defined water through money. When in fact it is substance that allows money to be defined.

Looking at the usage of the word substance, it implies equality as all substance is substance none less or more than substance meaning it is the living statement of equality. We must give equal value to substance as ourselves and not allow ourselves to prioritize or limit ourselves through the current application/limitation of money placing some substance above other substance.

http://equalmoney.org