2012 How to Change Competition and Survival

While watching Frozen Planet a peculiar image struck me and that was of a penguin stealing another penguin’s rocks in order to build his own nest. What they do is build a nest out of available rocks in the artic, so that the females are enticed by their proposal to lay their eggs there. It is similar to owning property as a sign of value to a mate in the ritual that we play when looking for a mate. So while one penguin was going and gathering rocks, there was another penguin close by him, and each time the one who was gathering rocks left his nest, the other would walk up to its nest and steal the rocks and build his own nest with them.

This is quite similar to what we as humans do and is also quite deceptive and from the point of competition of finding a mate. We as well will stab others in the back so that we can survive in this world as well. Why this struck me is because I have been judging humanity for its actions as if they are the worst of the worst, but that simply is not the case. All Life on Earth is equal and one to humans and humans are equal and one to all life on Earth, thus any judgment is irrelevant. Penguins will steal from eachother so that they can find a mate and in that prolong their existence. People will steal and manipulate eachother so that they can gain money so that they can prolong their existence. So why live like this?

I don’t find this way of living cool at all. I mean why must we compete with others on this Earth in order to survive? Why can we not live with each other supporting each other to better each other. Only when the point of having to survive or fight for our survival on this planet is removed will that be within reach. Thus only when we don’t need to go out and forage for food (work for money) will we be able to consider our neighbours as our equals and assist them in life as well as ourselves equal and one. Thus only once an Equal money system is established will we be able to change indefinitely our course of nature and as a result change the course of nature of this world. We as humans are able to change our nature…simply through the choice of whether or not we want to mate is an example of how we can alter our nature, so why accept our nature the way it is, why not exist as a group supporting the group doing what is best for the group and thus best for self in all moments? Join Desteni, Support Equal money. 

2012 CETA and Equal Money System

The Canadian government and the European Union have been planning a trade agreement since 2009 to allow each other’s enterprises into the other’s borders to be able to make a profit with whatever the choose to make a profit with. This agreement is significant because European corporations can now exploit Canadian resources for financial gain and Canadian corporations can exploit European Resources for financial gain. What is important in the agreement is that Canada has chosen to allow our water up for exploitation which will thus privatize our drinking water and waste water.

There has been a big dispute over this point, and I am not sure why. We now pay for our water…we buy bottles like fools, our water consumption is included in our utilities bill, it is privatized but not by a `private company` but by the corporation that is a city = it says on the border of our city here - `The Corporation Of the City of Cambridge`, thus it is not a city it is a money making opportunity off of the residents that live within the border and thus our water is privatized through/as our city that is a corporation.

From reading a few articles from the Canadian perspective, we fear letting go of our water and fear European companies coming into Canada and exploiting the resource, making our water supplies privatized, having our money that we pay for our water currently move into a private company than a government. To me this is the same thing as the government does what it wants with our money such as war, cutting education, cutting health benefits, raising CPP, etc , so then what this does is take money away from our municipal and provincial government and put that money into a private company, when looking at it is not cool because that company obviously does not have the infrastructure nor the living standards of the population in mind when making the decisions of what to do with their money.

Another thing in this agreement is the point of government procurement. From reading about it, government procurement is like a kickback where the government gets extra money for the private companies venturing into the borders and `enterprising`. What the EU is wanting within the agreement is a restriction on what the government can do with the procurement, meaning that the federal government is not able to allocate the procurement towards any sub-governments thus it cannot allocate money towards provincial or municipal government to increase infrastructure or better the community.

Obviously this is not what is best for all in this case as people are going to be exploited in this deal and things are not going to work out for the best for each participant within/as the CETA agreement.

In an EqualMoney System this will not need to take place as the ownership of resources of the Earth will not belong to one government or one being, as the Earth provides it unconditionally to all that are here on this earth no matter how much money one has in their pockets. The only being that limits resources to another is humans and because of profit, and in an Equal money system we will not need to make deals to exploit other land resources in order to make a dollar because the point of making a dollar is because of the point of survival based on needing to make that dollar and when that needing to make a dollar is removed and the dollar is given unconditionally in support of life as who you are here on Earth we will not need to venture out and find new ways to exploit resources in order to make a dollar, we will be able to work with what is here, because the dollar is already in our pockets, investigating the best method to provide every one water, investigating the best method of shelter, investigating the best method of clothing instead of the Exploitation that exists now in order to make a dollar. Thus In an equal money system we will not need to exploit eachother to make another dollar because we will have an everlasting dollar from birth to death constantly supporting our existence on Earth unconditionally.

Mercy and Justice are fundamental for civlized human Life

Mercy and Justice are fundamental for civlized human Life

This was a quote from an English course assignment that I am working on. I looked at this point and saw it as bullshit. Why is it bullshit? Looking at how and why justice and mercy first exist is because there must be a form of uncivilized action, events for mercy or justice to exist, thus a starting point of justice and mercy is from/as uncivilized action. Thus justice and mercy is needed IN an uncivilized environment to attempt to maintain a civilized environment, thus they are not fundamental for a civilized life, they are fundamental in an uncivilized life.

In a civilized life, where all humans are civilized there would obviously be no need for mercy or justice as it would be CIVILIZED, crime, murder, rape, starvation, would not exist as it would be civilized thus no crimes against ourselves would exist and thus mercy would not exist and thus justice as we have come to know/define it today would no longer exist as civilized human behavior would run rampant, rather than what we have today = uncivilized human behavior in which mercy and justice are applicable and relevant.

This is a pre-programmed belief that the human is forever evil and that for civilized life we must control the human, we must accept the fact that we are going to be uncivilized, and to have a `civilized` life justice and/or mercy must exist so that we can maintain the human’s existence as it is, instead of questioning why the human is acting the way it is and how we have come to this point in existence.

The main point of why we are uncivilized is due to our accepted nature of the movement and rules behind/as the monetary system in this reality. We are uncivilized because we are all out for ourselves as that is what this environment as money creates, it creates a separation of humans from humans as if we are unlike our neighbours, thus we only care about ourselves which creates the decivilization that we see and exist as today. For civilization to exist we must work in agreement and accordance with/as our neighbours instead of attempting to manipulate them so that we can profit from them, which is how this money system operates and supports now, and how we operate and support as ourselves. We must work in accordance and agreement to support ourselves equally, trust each other to do what is best for each other, and again this system does not support that, thus we must change this system of/as ourselves into something that considers all that is here as equals to truly live in a civilized reality.

We must change this system into one that supports what is best for all. http://equalmoney.org

A company's Transition into what is best for all

Companies in an EMS will be for what is best for all, no longer supporting individual profit for the CEO’s or Presidents of a company, companies will have what is best for all as their intentions, but a question that occurs is how will the transition take place?

One must look at the products that is being sold and whether or not they are in support of what is best for all or whether they are still in support of only for profit. One must then look at if the products are then possible to be changed into what is best for all, such as a magazine that is in support of the beauty system and all the intricacies within/as the beauty system and the abuse that it entails, and change that magazine towards support and spreading a message that is best for all, instead of one that causes diminishment within a person based on physical appearance. That transition is when people will decide to live what is best for all in every moment, when we no longer accept anything that is less than what is best for us as life. That transition will take place when we start to consider all others in this world and our effects on them seeing them as equals and if we would want that life, the consequences, for ourselves. It will happen through a movement as humanity will choose to stand up doing what is best for all relinquishing self from self-interest as/through personal profit and making sure that humanity/life profits through an expansion of as life, a prospering of life.

Through a choice by humanity to decide to do what is best for all and to support what is best for all will only then businesses change into what is best for all and stop supporting an interest in personal monetary profit…meaning the images and ideals supported within a beauty magazine help support the cosmetic industry, and the esthetic industry continuing a revolution of money within/as those industries which is all out of personal profit as they will all support each other and not what is best for all, where in when we as humanity decide to do and live what is best for all only then will we demand that businesses change into supporting what is best for all, so instead of demonizing pimples the magazines could simply offer information on what they are and how one in able to support oneself as pimples instead of attempting to cover up/destroy/remove pimples

They how all comes down to humanities will then the specifics of how to support what is best for all within/as the industries/companies that are existent today and whether or not they should still exist in an Equal Money System, or how we would be able to transform it into a company that is able to support what is best for all as living beings.

For more information visit http://equalmoney.org

We are not Separate from the `1%`

In the book `The Tipping Point` by Malcolm Gladwell, he describes a scene of violence that took place on the New York subway system in 1984. A `Normal` Caucasian man entered the subway and sat down by 4 young black males who were not ebing sat next to by any of the other passengers on the train due to their rebellious nature. One of the teens asked the white man for five dollars…he demanded it, “Give me five dollars”. The elder man then got up and shot the four young blacks. He was fed up with the lack of justice in the subway system at that time, violence and crimes were becoming more and more, to which the white man shot four teens who were rebellious. He then goes into the history of both parties. He describes the background of each of the four youths, and the man who shot them. He describes the environment in which they were in. In those days the subway system of New York were splattered with graffiti and trash, the turnstiles for the subway barely worked. The environment in that time was in chaos, thus the chaos was represented in the behavior of the people on the subway.

                 

              What happened next is interesting. What most advocates of justice etc. would propose, is to place more cops in the subway system, to enforce more laws onto these people, but that is not what happened, what happened is that the person who became in charge of the subway system went an entirely different direction. He painted all of the subway again, he got them much cleaner, he enforced the law of turnstile jumping much more, and what happened at that time is that the crime started to diminish heavily. Only through the small acts of changing the environment and enforcing a law which many officers did not care about because it was only about $1.50 for each person jumping the stiles. Through the enforcement of the law of jumping the turn stiles they were able to catch much more people who were carrying knives, or guns, or drugs onto the subway system and within that effectively diminished crime. Through re-painting the street cars they were able to make the environment much more approachable and appealing for people who would have rather walked when the street cars were filthy.

                

              Malcolm then goes on to describe that people see us only in certain aspects of ourselves, yet many of us are that aspect and as well the opposite. Meaning that to describe a friend we can say that they are an `honest person` yet we do not see them in times of dishonesty due to the circumstances of each event. He then goes onto explain that if he went though the childhood despair that the man who shot the four youths did, and was placed in the same environment and context as that man, he would most likely have shot those four youths as well.

                 

           This is an important realization as it is a realization that we are no different than any other person on this Earth and to believe that we are is absurd. It is only the experiences that we go through, that we hold onto that come to define us and how we act, or approach any given situation. And this is currently what is happening in the occupy wall street movement. We are not realizing that if we were to place ourselves in bankers positions that we would absolutely act the exact same way that they have, we would be no different than them because of their upbringing etc. The movement is only saying that they are greedy and they have fucked us over when in fact we have all accepted this fuck over. We accepted people having more power than others, and thus within this the movement is attempting to state its power because the `1%` are greedy and they are not, yet if we were to exist in their shoes we would do the exact same thing. So it not to blame but to explain the workings of the system itself and how it is not fair for all in this world, and how it is not in fact beneficial for all that are living on this earth.  The problem within this world is the capitalistic system and the greed within all humans, and the capitalistic system allowing that greed to infest the entire world, and thus allowing the human to only look out for themselves, not placing themselves as all that are living in this world, plant and animal included.

               

        Most of the `1%` are for capitalism because they have profited from it, and I have seen the excuse that they employ others to justify their stance for capitalism, they are fine with capitalism because they have `won` while all others have `lost` within the game of capitalism. It is in fact the system that is in place that is the problem, it is the fact that the human is the way the human is within and without on all sides, no different from the rest of humanity. Thus the answer is a new system, not a `beheading` of the 1% or a demonization of the 1%, it is to realize that we too would have done the exact same thing in their shoes, through/as their upbringing and the environment that they have grown up around and have been exposed to.

                

          A new system is needed for this Earth to become truly sustainable…well for the human to become sustainable with/as the Earth. That is why I support an Equal money system. Investigate more at http://equalmoney.org all information is there, yes the forum is there as well, but not to support questions that the information on the site offers. As well there are many FAQ videos out now that answer those types of questions. Check it out, investigate it.

Consequences of the Human = Extinction of Fish

June 21^st 2011
The eurozone news has come out with a report noting that the marine life is being extinct at a rate where within a generation (80-100) years the coral reefs will be extinct. The rate at which they are dying in high…extremely high. This is news! The marine life feeds 1/5^th of the population’s protein intake. So at the rate that they are dying there will be a massive epidemic food wise for all of us to face. The reasons? Carbon Dioxide, Over fishing, and pollution are the problems.

The coral reefs are a massive support system for the entire ocean. They support much life at the bottom of the food chain, and within the coral reefs that life at the bottom of the food chain is simply going to die, thus causing much more animals to starve to death etc etc. The pyramid food structure is going to suffer intensely through our actions. We have gone too far to turn back and correct things within a moment. I mean at this moment we must stop, but that simply is not going to happen as we have enslaved ourselves to the system that we have created a thus we have doomed ourselves. I mean it will take at least a generation at this stage to move through our current reliance on the resources we have within the current system that we are moving in. The solution is a new system but first we must forgive and let go of everything that we have currently created. But lets focus on what is here currently which is our demise as a species

Since the marine life is being heavily affected by our actions, it is going to cause a massive butterfly affect speading across the globe. We are not stopping or calming down our carbon output, we are only making it seems though. Like for example there was a news story about a coal plant who had to reduce their carbon emissions...how did they do that? By buying a price of the rainforest to have under the companies name thus since trees absorb carbon dioxide it was a loop hole within the system, so we are not stopping anything, in fact we are progressing this shit further. China is progressing at a speed to which it will top out the States for highest GDP in about 10 years. 

This means that more must be produced within china thus more fuel must be used, more everything must be used there only exponentially increasing the problem. The oil, the pollution, the plastic that we are endlessly consuming and simply throwing out with no consideration of the consequences of our actions will take its toll on us and there are consequences whether or not we face them or not they will come to us through suffering or through us facing them, sitting down and working out a solution.

Looking at the extent of the problem we are fucked. We are not slowing down in any way. We are continuously moving forward with no regard ot what we are doing..we are sticking to what we know and that has been the current system that we have been following. We are not willing to change immediately for the benefit of all even if it means loving some bullshit we call money.  From looking at out application and reliance on money I do not see us moving in the direction that the scientists have proposed…we never have, we have only been loyal to our god money over and over. Fishing is suggested to create a massive overhaul of their methods, and to stop fishing as much…but looking at money, there are people that need to eat that fish on those boats…the more the catch the bigger their paycheck, so there is incentive to fish as much as possible. Creating a cap on fishing will limit the people from living as well as they do and I am sure that they will not accept that sitting down even though it is what is best for all. Unfortunately we only consider ourselves when considering our decisions, we do not consider the whole and the outcomes and the possibilities in terms of the whole, only consider our own miniscule lives.

This is for the fish life, but nonetheless all in connected on Earth, all is intertwined as life. We are all reliant on eachother for our survival. Each species relies on all others to maintain a sustainable existence, so the fact that marine life is facing an extinction that relates to the dinosaurs is significant, as this will affect all life here on this Earth. We have successfully destroyed this Earth, and ourselves. The one species to commit suicide.