2012 Microchipping Humans

Yesterday me and a few co-workers got into a discussion about microchipping. I was `in support` of microchipping due to human nature whereas they were opposed to it. I was having trouble elaborating on the subject and as to why I was `in support` of it other than desteni is in support of it so this here is for me to explain my backing of said microchipping and to further elaborate on the subject for myself.

Microchipping can be an absolutely useful tool in terms of managing humans. Face it, humans are deceitful, manipulative, abusive, harmful, etc, so why and how can we trust humans with the nature in which it exists currently, and even more than that how can we trust them to change their nature without self-forgiveness. The microchip then becomes a solution at monitoring humans and making sure that crimes against life do not happen, making sure that a human being is stopped and corrected before it takes the thoughts into physical action of harming another human being.

Look at the example of the Okalahoma Bombing where an individual blew up a truck killing a little over a hundred human beings. If this person was monitored through his actions and the key signal points were caught showing that this person is going to harm someone or some people he could have been stopped and shown how we was in fact only harming himself and how destruction/violence/murder is not a solution to what he was going through. It could have been shown to him how he was in fact creating the fuckupedness that was existing in/as himself  and shown how to release himself of his self-created demons. So in that manner it is possible to stop many people from committing criminal acts before they set out to harm another living being.  Same can be said for the Norway killer who murdered 77 people. If he was monitored he would have simply been stopped before this man could commit these crimes. So for the reason that the human is the way it is, it is beneficial for the human to be monitored through microchipping so that we are not allowed to become this possessed and are able to be helped before we kill people.

One of the arguments that they were carrying with them is the `mind-control`, where the argument is based out of the belief that the `higher powers` or `elite` will control their every whim and get them to do their bidding. What is ironic in this situation is that we are now controlled to abide by their every whim. We accept going to war as a justifiable action to people who `offend us` or do not follow our own set of rules. We buy the products that they want us to buy and we give into the belief that we need these products. There is rarely a person that exists that is not influenced whatsoever by media and the desires supported through media, thus we are controlled through our desires into doing what the `elite` want. So the argument stating they will control us becomes irrelevant because we are already controlled to an extensive level.

Another argument was brought up of conforming to society, that the creators of the microchip and/or monitors of the microchip will cast out any person who thinks differently than the accepted norm of society and jail them or brainwash them. If you have read 1984 by George Orwell this refers to `Thought Police`. Now what is fascinating about this reality is that they don’t need to monitor individual by individual on their thoughts, because the moment a person speaks about a different life, other individuals will snap on them, call them outcasts, hate on them, and do everything that they see fit to stop the person from continuing to speak against the accepted and allowed norms, so what has developed now is much better than thought police because society will attempt to shut down any person who speaks out against society, so a group of individuals do not need to monitor other individuals because the whole monitors the whole keeping everyone in check and balance to the conformity of the society.. A perfect example is desteni where we stand as a message that humanity is killing this Earth, that we are but a infection to  this Earth, but through forgiving ourselves, through becoming aware of our actions, through transcending our minds we can create a new self that is will live in the principle of what is best for all and thus harmonizing self with the Earth yet, many individuals fear this message, and throw abusive, really nasty, words at us, even going to the extent of death threats showing that the whole will attack an individual that speaks out against the whole effectively keeping the whole in check and balance to the accepted and allowed rules/laws without question. So the point of they will monitor anyone who thinks outside of the accepted norm is again already established despite microchipping.

So what I've learnt is that people who are against microchipping only want to defend their ability to abuse others, they want to defend their own thoughts that harm others, they want to defend their `right to abuse` as it were. I see no other reason as to defend humanity to not have microchips other than fear and the want to continue abuse.  For more information read the material at http://desteni.org Investigate http://equalmoney.org to understand why/how humanity has been living the way that it has. Only when we forgive ourselves for how we have been acting, once we live the forgiveness, once we start to live as breath realizing that we are not separate from this Earth can we start to rebuild ourselves and our lives on this Earth equal and one.

Supressing Self

Through watching the documentary (the second part now) "The Century of Self" I have learnt that through suppressing our `natural` emotions, the emotions that are too outrageous for us to face, we become very confused beings, we become uncertain of who we are and of who we should become and what we should do with ourselves. This can lead to suicide, this can lead to hysteria, dementia, schizophrenia, and many other mental illnesses. The reason why these occur is because how we as humans have accepted and allowed society to develop, and how we have conditioned ourselves to conform to a certain accepted lifestyle. This conformity is the goal of society in order to keep society running/flowing in the way that it has been, and through conforming we become a guided programmed being with the goals and objectives in that which society has already `in store` for us. All of our life is directed once we conform to `how we should live`, and in that we become automated following the direction that which society would like for us, and in that not directing ourselves but having these desires and unconscious thoughts direct us.

Within conforming to society we are suppressing who we are as humans, through attempting to live like `civilized` beings, not taking a look at who we are as `nature` and deciding to change that as who we are as our nature. Our nature is disgusting = look at how we have been treating the Earth and ourselves, look at how we have in fact been existing. It is not special, we are not significant, we are actually quite fucking oblivious to how we are actually existing, we are not a benevolent creature, we are a destructive one. So what is interesting about the point of the ability to suppress ourselves is that if we are able to suppress ourselves we are able to change ourselves, we are able to stop living as our accepted nature, but in order to change ourselves we must face ourselves. We must face the ugliness as who we are and in that face who we are as thoughts, as that which we have become, forgive the acceptance of how we have lived, remove the symbols that which stimulate how we have been living and set a goal of equality in that we see eachother as equals, as another being walking this planet equal and one to me, as another source of substance equal and one to me as substance equally, and in that realize that what we do to another we in fact do to ourselves, and live a new self living in a way that is best for all and best for self.

Investigate Desteni and Investigate an Equal Money System, see how we must change in order to live as new beings, and to stop our destructive self.

2012 How to Change Competition and Survival

While watching Frozen Planet a peculiar image struck me and that was of a penguin stealing another penguin’s rocks in order to build his own nest. What they do is build a nest out of available rocks in the artic, so that the females are enticed by their proposal to lay their eggs there. It is similar to owning property as a sign of value to a mate in the ritual that we play when looking for a mate. So while one penguin was going and gathering rocks, there was another penguin close by him, and each time the one who was gathering rocks left his nest, the other would walk up to its nest and steal the rocks and build his own nest with them.

This is quite similar to what we as humans do and is also quite deceptive and from the point of competition of finding a mate. We as well will stab others in the back so that we can survive in this world as well. Why this struck me is because I have been judging humanity for its actions as if they are the worst of the worst, but that simply is not the case. All Life on Earth is equal and one to humans and humans are equal and one to all life on Earth, thus any judgment is irrelevant. Penguins will steal from eachother so that they can find a mate and in that prolong their existence. People will steal and manipulate eachother so that they can gain money so that they can prolong their existence. So why live like this?

I don’t find this way of living cool at all. I mean why must we compete with others on this Earth in order to survive? Why can we not live with each other supporting each other to better each other. Only when the point of having to survive or fight for our survival on this planet is removed will that be within reach. Thus only when we don’t need to go out and forage for food (work for money) will we be able to consider our neighbours as our equals and assist them in life as well as ourselves equal and one. Thus only once an Equal money system is established will we be able to change indefinitely our course of nature and as a result change the course of nature of this world. We as humans are able to change our nature…simply through the choice of whether or not we want to mate is an example of how we can alter our nature, so why accept our nature the way it is, why not exist as a group supporting the group doing what is best for the group and thus best for self in all moments? Join Desteni, Support Equal money. 

2012 Changing Human Nature

There is a measurement called the Power-Distance Index that measures how people see titles in this system and how they are within/as the definitions of the titles. For instance it measures how an employee will see their manager and how far they see the manager from themselves. A high power distance indexed country is Brazil, and a Low PDI country is New Zealand, so in Brazil a manager has a lot of power over an employee and that employee will be subservient to their manager to the fullest extent whereas in New Zealand an employee would take much less `shit` from their employer, and more so, see their employer as their equal.

In the book outliers `Outliers` by Malcolm Gladwell, the PDI is brought up in relation to investigating how flights crash and what events and significant roles are taking place in the case of crashes. The PDI consists of measuring a person’s view of a `superior` figure in their world to determine the PDI, but it is not only the `view` of a superior but the accepted and allowed `nature` of how the superior is able to be treated and is expected to be treated by a subordinate.  In the book an account of an auditor sitting in on a flight with Korean Air is given

In the Delta report on Korean Air that was posted anonymously on the Internet, one of the auditors tells a story of sitting in on a Korean Air flight where the first officer for confused while listening to the Air Traffic Control and mistakenly put the plane on a course intended for another plane…..and then comes the key sentence: “Captain hit First Officer with the back of his hand for making the error.””(Gladwell, 214)

In this example the power distance index is clearly shown where the captain is the superior and the first officer is the subordinate and the interactions between the two are severely one-sided. In the accepted and allowed nature of Koreans the superior is able to hit the subordinate for making a mistake and it is accepted as so, thus the nature of a subordinate that is programed into/as the culture of Koreans is to be submissive, passive, to take abuse, etc. Here is another example of how the accepted and allowed nature of a superior and a subordinate is Korean culture.

At a dinner table, a lower-ranking person must wait until a higher-ranking person sits down and starts eating, while the reverse does not hold true; one does not smoke in the presence of a social superior; when drinking with a social superior, the subordinate hides his glass and turns away from the superior;…in greeting a social superior a Korean must bow” (Ho-min Sohn)

Why this is important is because in the investigation of airline crashes the First officer whom was communicating with the Air Traffic control centre, or with the captain himself, who had witnessed a dire mistake with the route, plane, or operation of the plane was too timid and passive to speak up about the problem to his `superiors` which lead to quite a few crashes in Korean Airlines.

When all of this was going on (Korean Airlines is not a top ranking airline is flights to crash ratio) Korean Airlines called in an outside person to solve this problem which was inherent in the Korean’s nature. He had to re-train them to develop assertiveness and to take control over situations when it is needed from them to avoid a crash or a fatal failure in communication or operations. The Koreans who were employed by Korean Airlines had to make substantial changes to their nature of who they accepted and allowed themselves to be in order to function properly and safely while flying a plane.

After leaving Korean Air, Greenberg helped start up a freight airline called Cargo 360, and he took a number of Korean pilots with him. They were all flight engineers, who had been number three, after the captain and the first officer, in the strict hierarchy of the original Korean Air. “These were guys who had performed in the old environment at Korean Air for as much as fifteen to eighteen years,” he said. “They had accepted that subservient role. They had been at the bottom of the ladder. We retrained them and put them with Western crew. They’ve been a great success. They all changed their style. They take initiative. They pull their share of the load. They don’t wait for someone to direct them. These are senior people, in their fifties with a long history in one context, who have been retrained and are now successful doing their job in a Western cockpit (Gladwell, 220)

So for all you nay-sayers that human nature cannot and will not change in relation to an Equal Money system, here is proof that human nature can indeed change, it is all in the choices of who and what we accept and allow ourselves to be and become. You only are against an Equal Money system so that you can maintain your lifestyle and keep your abusive selves and the abusive system and world that we are currently living within/as. To state that human nature is unable to change is only stating that you are not willing to change as it is evident and clear that humans do in fact have the ability to change their nature. Stop fighting for your right to abuse, join desteni and change self into/as a better self that walks in support of what is best for all in every moment so that we may manifest what is best for all here on this Earth, and stop stating that human nature is unable to change as that is not fact.

2012 Why Aliens are not coming to `Save us`

2012 Why Aliens are not coming to `save us`

It is a commonly held belief that a race of superior beings will come down this year and rescue only a certain few to restart the human race over again once the `shit has hit  the fan`. Unfortunately, no matter how great this sounds, this is not going to happen. If aliens were watching us they would see and understand that we as humanity are simply killing ourselves and are deciding to do nothing about it. They would the understand that humans are complete morons and should not exist another generation because all that we have done throughout our history is abuse, rape, demolish, de-life the Earth.

Take a look at what if aliens were watching us. They would see us killing eachother. They would see us clearing out forests that provide oxygen for us as well as all other non-plant life on this Earth. They would see us destroying wildlife habitats continuously. They would see us dehumanizing other humans because of a belief in who `created us`. They would see people allowing people to starve to death while others get to live in a luxury that is unheard of in the natural world. They would see animals being raised so that they can be slaughtered, they would see animals being kept in conditions that are horrendous, abused and tortured. Given all this that they would see on a MASS scale why would they decide that humanity must live on and that a few must repopulate the Earth? Because of Love? Unfortunate as it is, love has never existed and will never exist within/as humanity in the current state of/as humanity = look at the entirety of the human race and its actions and tell me if there is anything that resembles love. Because a few specific human beings love? Again, no that does not exist either, in the micro and macrocosm all relate each other equally thus one human is equal to all of humanity thus not one human loves when humanity exists the way it does. Thus why would an `intelligent` being decide to save humanity? If an alien was intelligent it would know not to waste its time on humanity because humanity has shown what it actually is.

So people, we have created this mess that we are currently surrounded by and we must get ourselves out of this mess. There are no alien races that will be coming to save our asses from our own shit, we must take responsibility for what we have created here on Earth and fix ourselves as the mess that we have created. We must fix this mess by `fixing`/changing ourselves into something that supports life. This takes a reworking of our Nature as human beings, and it first takes an understanding of our Nature as human beings currently. It is not going to be fun because we must face the shit that we are in order to become fertilizer for life. We must forgive ourselves for what we have accepted and allowed ourselves to exist as and do, so that we can move past how we are acting and re-create ourselves in equality in the physical as Earth/Universe. Investigate the tools of Self-honesty, Self-forgiveness, Self-correction as well as the principles of what is best for all and Equality and Oneness at http://desteni.org . Research, investigate, and support an Equal money system as the solution for a method on how to receive the necessities of life at http://equalmoney.org

Mercy and Justice are fundamental for civlized human Life

Mercy and Justice are fundamental for civlized human Life

This was a quote from an English course assignment that I am working on. I looked at this point and saw it as bullshit. Why is it bullshit? Looking at how and why justice and mercy first exist is because there must be a form of uncivilized action, events for mercy or justice to exist, thus a starting point of justice and mercy is from/as uncivilized action. Thus justice and mercy is needed IN an uncivilized environment to attempt to maintain a civilized environment, thus they are not fundamental for a civilized life, they are fundamental in an uncivilized life.

In a civilized life, where all humans are civilized there would obviously be no need for mercy or justice as it would be CIVILIZED, crime, murder, rape, starvation, would not exist as it would be civilized thus no crimes against ourselves would exist and thus mercy would not exist and thus justice as we have come to know/define it today would no longer exist as civilized human behavior would run rampant, rather than what we have today = uncivilized human behavior in which mercy and justice are applicable and relevant.

This is a pre-programmed belief that the human is forever evil and that for civilized life we must control the human, we must accept the fact that we are going to be uncivilized, and to have a `civilized` life justice and/or mercy must exist so that we can maintain the human’s existence as it is, instead of questioning why the human is acting the way it is and how we have come to this point in existence.

The main point of why we are uncivilized is due to our accepted nature of the movement and rules behind/as the monetary system in this reality. We are uncivilized because we are all out for ourselves as that is what this environment as money creates, it creates a separation of humans from humans as if we are unlike our neighbours, thus we only care about ourselves which creates the decivilization that we see and exist as today. For civilization to exist we must work in agreement and accordance with/as our neighbours instead of attempting to manipulate them so that we can profit from them, which is how this money system operates and supports now, and how we operate and support as ourselves. We must work in accordance and agreement to support ourselves equally, trust each other to do what is best for each other, and again this system does not support that, thus we must change this system of/as ourselves into something that considers all that is here as equals to truly live in a civilized reality.

We must change this system into one that supports what is best for all. http://equalmoney.org

Positive outlook for humanity is still not best

In a video stating a cause for green technology and a green movement was showing the degradation of red woods on the west coast of North America. In a pessimistic scientific calculation of the degradation of the red woods, the red woods got to an extinct point by 2090. In an opposite scientific calculation of a view point of optimistic growth or reduction of the trees, they had less degradation by 2090.

The positive outlook is in relation to humanity taking on the opportunity to go into `green` technology and not using the fossil fuels to fuel the planet. The pessimistic view point is if we do not make a change. The interesting point within this scientific study is that even if we move into the point of `optimism` we are still going to kill off much of the old growth red woods. Looking at this point it is obvious that we as humanity use far too much power. We are constantly producing and consuming because things are now made to break, things are now made to be useless within a short period of time so the system that is capitalism can survive, while the system that is the Earth slowly dies. So even with a push towards become more `green` in relation to our energy usage and our forms of energy usage and/or creation we are still using up the same amount of energy to continue our current system of capitalism, as capitalism can only survive if there is a constant influx of capital/money, thus we must be able to continue to generate money as products and services to allow this system to survive, but as is obvious, the more we have a need to generate capital the more resources of the Earth we are going to use up, the more minerals, trees, plants, water, etc we are going to have to use, thus going `green` within the capitalistic system is FAR from a fucking solution.

It is our acceptance of how we are living within/as the capitalistic system that is the problem as there is a NEED for a constant flow of money to keep stability but over time it is not possible to sustain itself as we are creating money out of resources and giving a specific value onto the resources in relation to the dollar, when money is in fact not real. Many of us see this yet do not want to look at what will happen if we continue within/as the current monetary system of capitalism. Nor is it money’s fault that we are this way…it is our fault. Thus it is not to remove money from the equation, it is to remove how we have been looking at this world, how we have been living, and to change our living into something that is best for all, instead of what it is now = self-interest with disregard for any life that is here on Earth equal to us. This is why an Equal money System is a solution

In an EMS it takes into account how we have been living and the rules within/as the current system that we are abiding by. It removes the possibility for us to act the way that we have…take a look at humanity as a whole and it is destructive, harmful, careless. An EMS is set rules that are in the interest of what is best for all instead of the interest of a few, instead of the interest in making more money, which is the set rules of this current system. It stops any possibility of frauding the system, it takes away to want to steal others as all is provided to each equally and unconditionally, it stops the need for greed as profit is impossible within an EMS, thus making `more` and allowing the cheating, lies, deception to gain `more` no longer is a necessity to `win` in/as reality’s monetary system.

In an EMS the red wood trees will have an opportunity to expand and not only lessen their degradation rate within a optimistic view point of humanity. All life is considered equally, and actions revolve around what is best for all life here on earth as it is clear that all life includes self as well. The only point that needs to happen for this to take effect is for humanity to start living what is best for all to bring about this current system, and to see the consequences and effects of how we are living now, stand up and make a change within/as self for the betterment of life here on Earth.

Here is a link to the video - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-swLTsWXPII